Showing posts with label performance management. Show all posts
Showing posts with label performance management. Show all posts

Thursday, September 17, 2009

Summer's Top 150: Supervision & Performance Management

I know, I know. This "dump post" includes way too many articles. But the topic is soooo important!
  1. Three Questions for Potential Managers to Ask Themselves
  2. New Managers: Alone and Out of Their Depths
  3. Middle Managers: The Meat in the Sandwich
  4. Caring for Your People: Part of the Boss's Job
  5. The Penny Challenge
  6. How to Have More Productive Performance Appraisals
  7. The Dreaded Performance Review
  8. Straight Talk in a Slump
  9. What Leaders Can Learn from a Doctor About How to Deliver Bad News
  10. 7 Mistakes Bosses Make When Giving Criticism
  11. Ask Three Questions to Clarify Expectations
  12. Managers Who Coach Ask Questions That Enlighten
  13. Managers Who Coach: Overcome Dependency
  14. Develop Outstanding Employees Utilizing Effective Feedback
  15. Better Mentoring
  16. Adding a few points to Seth on leadership
  17. How To Inaugurate Effectiveness In Your Project Team
  18. If You Want Accountability, You Must Grant Authority
  19. It’s Not About FINDING Talent. It’s about IDENTIFYING and TAPPING What You Already Have
  20. Promotions and job fit
  21. What Alienates Top Performers
  22. Rewarded Employees Work Harder
  23. The Art of Giving Praise
  24. Leading Clever People
  25. Nine Ways to Identify Natural Leaders
  26. How to Identify Your Employees' Hidden Talents
  27. Empowering Leaders: Hand Over Your Keys
  28. Handling Quit-and-Stays
  29. Problem children: Dealing with whiney, crybaby malcontents in your ranks
  30. Management Interview Questions and Answers
  31. What makes a good boss?
  32. Stop Demotivating Me!
  33. Leadership: Intentional Influence
  34. Does Your Do Match Your Tell?
  35. How to Handle the Pessimist on Your Team

Sunday, June 14, 2009

Awesome Reading Recommendations

I've been away for the last two weeks, both for work and leisure. When I returned I had over 300 articles waiting for me in my RSS reader. I managed to process them all, and here are my top recommendations, arranged by themes:

On Staffing:
  1. Interviewing Doesn’t Work
  2. The Job Mismatch Problem - The Five Costs of the Wrong Employee In The Wrong Seat
  3. Interview questions for a Team Leader

On Thinking:
  1. Executive Behaviors, Your Boss Has No Clothes and Revolution from the Bottom
  2. Risk, Bravado and Their Consequences
  3. Change Your Thinking To Change Your Results!
  4. Being Strategic: The Antidote to Fear

On Collaboration:
  1. 8 Suggestions to Improve Your Team’s Problem Solving Skills
  2. 12 Ways To Listen
  3. The Ten Cultural Elements Of Collaboration In [Communities]
  4. Collective Intelligence (video)
  5. Toe Stepping Up The Corporate Ladder (a satire!)

On creativity and innovation:
  1. What is the True Value of Creativity to Organizations?
  2. Cultivate A Culture of Creativity
  3. The How of Innovation
  4. Twitter's Ten Rules For Radical Innovators
  5. Prospect theory, risk and innovation

On Leadership:
  1. Leadership and the Art of Apology
  2. How Do You Spot an Emerging Leader?
  3. Leading By Example & Mistaken Beliefs
  4. Leveraging Your Strengths
  5. Learning from Mistakes Takes the Right Feedback
  6. Everybody Knows About Your Weaknesses – Do You?
  7. Don’t Gamble On Your Performance Review
  8. Three Important Questions
  9. Stop Making Excuses
  10. Exert Ownership in Your Workplace
  11. The Circle of Care
  12. 8 Steps for Acting on Inspiration
  13. Culture and Engagement
  14. Rejecting the Default Culture
  15. Trauma Free Renewal
  16. 3 Paths to Development
  17. Authority, Leadership, and Truth
  18. Generals Win Battles but Sergeants Win Wars
  19. What Leaders Must Do Next

Miscellaneous:
  1. Your Firm’s Values Have No Teeth
  2. Going Beyond MBA Oaths
  3. Battling it Out During Tough Times: MBAs vs. Entrepreneurs
  4. Is it Time to Sell My Management Books?
  5. 5 Reasons You Keep Getting Stuck

And my favourite quote of the week:

"If you perform at your personal best, doing everything possible to make a success of the immediate situation, then doing it as a ‘leader’ or a ‘follower’ has no meaning." (Miki Saxon)

Tuesday, April 21, 2009

The Case for Managing Employee Performance

One of the recurring themes in my presentations (“Bottom-Up Renewal”, “Living Renewal”) as well as in my writings (“An Inconvenient Renewal”, this blog) has been performance management, more specifically: managing the performance of employees.

Today I made a presentation to my department’s PS Renewal Committee on this topic. I have uploaded the PowerPoint on GCPEDIA. For those of you who don’t have access to GCPEDIA, here’s the gist of it:

Firstly, it is important to distinguish between performance management as in “organization performance” vs. “employee performance”. The two concepts are interrelated, but have very different implications for supervisors.

Secondly, despite all the criticism against bureaucracy, the “public service of Canada employee performance management framework” (i.e. legislation, TBS policies and guidelines, collective agreements, etc.) is simple and straightforward. One of the most compelling quotes I came across actually comes from this overview of the Financial Administration Act:
“Performance management is a key enabler of effective human resources management and the achievement of organizational effectiveness and results. Effective performance management fosters integration of employee performance with organizational goals and results; engagement, responsibility and accountability for on-the-job performance and organizational results; and, fairness, consistency and transparency in the treatment, recognition and promotion of people. Integral to performance management are leadership, communication, coaching, mentoring, learning, development and recognition. Performance management results in a work culture in which excellence in performance is encouraged and recognized, and unsatisfactory performance effectively managed.”
Many tools and resources are available to supervisors to manage employee performance and hone their skills. Nevertheless, employee performance management is not valued and practiced as much as other management activities (i.e. financial management). There is currently a strong push for employee performance management in the public service. However for some reason people management in general is still not something that is commonly measured.

But if:
  • the management of employee performance and organizational performance are interdependent...
  • the management of employee performance is the responsibility of every supervisors...
  • the prescriptions and instruments for the management of employee performance are built into legislation, collective agreements, TBS guidelines, policies and directives, and departmental policies...
  • and the tools and resources for the management of employee performance are widely available to all public servants...
...Why is the management of employee performance a major weakness throughout most of the public service?

Is it because:
  • Organizational performance is possible without employees?
  • Employee performance management is less important than organizational performance management?
  • We tolerate poor employee performance management where we would never allow poor financial management?
  • Employee performance management is just optional?
Managing employee performance management is simple. The hard part is actually doing it, because most: s
  • Most supervisors are not appointed in their role based on their ability to manage employee performance;
  • Supervisors must manage employee performance every single day (as opposed to once a year);
  • Supervisors must be willing to have difficult conversations with employees;
  • Supervisors must practice truth-telling;
  • Supervisors must make unpopular decisions;
  • Supervisors must face their greatest fears.
With this in mind, the rest of my presentation focuses on the steps my organization has taken to make the management of employee performance a priority and “raise the bar”.

As potential solutions, I also offer the following:
  • Give employee performance management as much importance as we give to organizational performance management.
  • Be as diligent and rigorous with people management as we are with financial management (both of which, ironically, derive their authorities from the FAA).
  • Increase focus on day-to-day management of employee performance (not just on the annual performance appraisals).
  • Appoint people in supervisory roles based on their people management skills, their ability to manage employee performance, and their willingness to have difficult conversations with employees.
  • If supervisors are able to do the single most difficult aspect of their job well (i.e. managing performance of employees), the rest should follow naturally.
I'm considering turning this presentation into a "talk"... Does it make sense? Is the PS ready for this?

Your feedback is always appreciated.

Thanks!

Monday, April 20, 2009

Last Week's Best

I came across lots of interesting blog posts and links in the past week:
  1. One 'Bad Apple' Really Can Kill the Company
  2. Detoxing Your Team
  3. The Burden of Dealing with Poor Performers: Wear and Tear on the Supervisory Efficacy and Job Satisfaction
  4. Top ten reasons managers become great
  5. How about giving your Boss a Performance Review?
  6. Bully boss or victim?
  7. New research sheds light on bullying in the workplace
  8. Five Sources of Interpersonal Conflict in the Workplace – Part V – Mindset
  9. Leadership’s Future: Education And American Idol
  10. Is Your Team Diverse Or Just Look It?
  11. Pressure, panic and productivity
  12. Pay for Performance and the Business Week 50
  13. From Strategic Planning to Strategic Conversations
  14. What should I do with my life now?
  15. 10 Lessons For Life
  16. Can You Finish This Sentence: "...Teach a Man to Fish, He..."? I Betcha Can't...
  17. Four Ways To Spot Reduced Trust
  18. 3 Key Questions for HR
  19. Are Goals Evil? Here's my favourite insight from the post:
"My company previously used performance reviews that looked at “soft” skills only. We found through analysis that we could basically determine what an employee’s score would be by knowing who their supervisor was. The score was a reflection of the supervisor, not the employee."
You may also check out the original study. Here's the gist of it:
"In this article, we argue that the beneficial effects of goal setting have been overstated and that systematic harm caused by goal setting has been largely ignored. We identify specific side effects associated with goal setting, including a narrow focus that neglects non-goal areas, a rise in unethical behavior, distorted risk preferences, corrosion of organizational culture, and reduced intrinsic motivation."
I am waiting impatiently for the released of the 2008 Public Service Employee Survey results. More than four months have elapsed since the survey was administered and it appears it will take another month to get the results. Hum... If you want to know how I feel about this, check out this video.

Please vote for your three favourite posts on ContrarianThinking.ca if you haven't already done so! The poll is in the side-bar, at the top.

Sunday, April 12, 2009

Tuesday, February 03, 2009

Performance Management and Measurement

I've wanted to write this post for a long time. It may never have seen the day if it wasn't for the fact I've been asked to make a presentation on this exact topic in my (formerly undisclosed) Department.

Whenever I need to discuss a subject I know will be controversial (especially when I know my points of views will be "challenging" - and challenged! - by the people in the room), I like to draw extensively on the work of other authors. This way I can say precisely what I want to say, without sounding like I'm the first person to ever make such a statement. True to my habit, this is just what I will do for this post.

First, if performance management is new to you, you must read the chapter entitled "Performance Management : Panacea or Fools’s Gold?" written by Barbara Wake Carroll and David I. Dewar in "The Handbook of Canadian Public Administration" (2002, pp. 413-429). The authors lay the foundations for what performance management is:

“Performance measurement is the collection of information about the performance of programs using some indicator or standard of measurement. Performance monitoring is the review, or tracking, of the measurements. When they are used by a manager to improve programs they form part of a performance management system. [...] Performance management consists of four elements:
  • Deciding what is the desired level of performance
  • Measuring performance
  • Reporting or communicating performance information
  • Using performance information to compare actual performance to the agreed performance level”
The authors further explain that there are three levels of focus to performance management in the public sector:
  1. “The evaluation of programs or policy at the broad governmental or political level and includes a political consideration of basic objectives
  2. The implementation and management of a policy or program
  3. The assessment of the performance of individual employees”
(And I would add a fourth level: the management of an organization or business unit.)

Carroll and Dewar then make some distinctions with regards to what can be measured:
  • "Process: how something was done
  • Outputs: what was done or produced
  • Outcomes: what happened in society
  • Impact or results: what are the effect of what was done (what has changed as a result of the action) "
(They don't mention "inputs", but I think this one goes without saying as it is typically the easiest to measure and the one that usually gets all the attention.)

Based on my experience in project management, I see four challenges to performance measurement:
  1. Availability of data in a timely fashion (i.e. outcomes and outputs sometimes take years to materialize and data is therefore rarely - if ever - available upon completion of a project or implementation of a program);
  2. Priorities change over time (e.g. ever noticed how budgets become such a hot issue towards the end of fiscal when it's never nearly as big of a deal the rest of the year?);
  3. Ease of measuring (usually, information relevant to the "management" side of things are easier to measure: inputs, resources, hours of work, expenditures, etc.);
  4. Linking inputs, processes, outputs, outcomes and impacts (who can really prove that the inputs are directly tied to the outcomes?)
For these reasons, critics of performance measurement have voiced similar concerns in different terms (now is probably a good time to resort to quotes!):
  • "People revert to metrics out of fear, not out of vision." (Patrick Lencioni)
  • "Managers who don't know how to measure what they want settle for wanting what they can measure."(Russell L. Ackoff & Herbert J. Addison)
  • "Measurement has its pitfalls and dangers, however, as well as its benefits. The first, well-known danger is that you get what you measure. If measurements are attached to some facets of public service work then those are the things that will get attention, often at the expense of other, equally or more important dimensions of work. […] The second danger, which is a corollary of the first, and the one that concerns us most here, is that things that are difficult to measure may be neglected, while things that are easier to measure will enjoy exaggerated importance. Values, leadership and good people management are among those things that are not yet sufficiently valued, on the excuse that they are difficult to measure." (The Task Force on Values and Ethics)
As a former manager, I have always found resorting to metrics quite useful for:
  • Improving estimates (learning from experience);
  • Measuring efficiencies (do more with less);
  • Improving visibility of critical activities (what gets measured gets done);
  • Identifying problems in real time (and correct them);
  • Spot trends (across projects or units, recurring problems).
But recently I came across an amazing article written by Nicolas Berland, Catherine Chevalier-Kuzla and Samuel Sponem, entitled “On ne gère bien que ce que l’on mesure” published in the "Petit bréviaire des idées reçues en management" (2008). The authors offer what is probably the best dissection of the benefits and pitfalls of measurement I have read. Here are some of the highlights:

Benefits of Measurement:
  • Measurement allows synthesizing large quantities of information and clarifying the complex.
  • Measurement can make explicit relations between phenomena, and foster learning.
  • Measurement makes visible many aspects of the organization.
  • Measurement provides a common language and allows shared representation, because measurement is considered objective, i.e. detached from the individual.
  • Measurement allows the convergence of goals and allows changing organizations. Indeed, measurement is a support to evaluation systems and is a powerful means of incentive.
  • Measurement allows to classify actions, objects, and people compared to each other's, and thus determine the respective contributions and their scale, which in turn allows to decide and to act.
  • Measurable objectives allow to control from a distance other people's behaviours, to responsibilize them, and to motivate them.
  • Measurement is the antidote to ambiguity; it forces to be clear on vague concepts and forces to act.
Pitfalls of Measurement:
  • Measurement has a number of risks: simplification of reality, disconnect with the field, short term focus or short-sightedness, orient behaviours in the wrong direction because of a bad choice of performance indicator.
  • Measurement is interested first and foremost in the past.
  • Measurement omits important elements of long-term performance of an organization: quality, competence, trust, innovation, etc.
  • Furthermore, are easily measurable only variables relative to unambiguous objects. But management is often in the domain of ambiguity.
  • Measurement is only as good as the systems and people that captured (garbage in garbage out)
  • The danger of motivating people through numbers is that they will disregard what is not measured.
  • Sometimes, performance indicators take a life of their own. Measurement is no longer synonym with good management but rather out of hand bureaucracy. What was initially a means to improve the functioning of the organization becomes an end in itself: you must increase (or decrease) the number, no matter the underlying reality. Measurement takes over management.
The key point made by the authors however is when they say that the true value of performance measurement is not in providing answers as much as raising questions. They go on to offer the most honest look at what performance management really accomplishes:
  • Measurement can be used to move your agenda forward.
  • Measurement is a symbol. It doesn't have to be exact, only to influence people.
  • When measurement doesn't produce the expected result, the easiest thing may be to change the measurement.
  • In the end what counts is less measurement than the result of the action created by measurement.
The authors close on some philosophical questions about performance management and measurement:
  • Where does the obsession for measurement come from?
  • What are the real ends of measurement for a manager?
  • Do we manage better because we measure more?
  • Do we manage poorly when we don't measure?
  • Is measurement sufficient for good management?
While you ponder these questions, let me recommend you some more reading: